Head-to-head · Liquid Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (3) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Phase Labs Phase Labs is a Solana staking infrastructure provider that issues phaseSOL, a liquid staking token representing SOL delegated through its validator setup. The hook is staking that stays liquid, so th... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.7/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Phase Labs (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Phase Labs uses a free model, while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Phase Labs offers 5 features including phaseSOL liquid staking token, Non-custodial SOL staking, Enterprise-grade validator infrastructure, and 2 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Phase Labs currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Phase Labs's key strengths include keeps staked sol liquid via phasesol, non-custodial; keys stay with the user, hardened validator and multisig security. Sanctum stands out for solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts.
More comparisons
Compare Phase Labs with…
Compare Sanctum with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 81,071 |
| Categories | Liquid Staking | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Solana liquid staking provider offering phaseSOL LST with enterprise-grade validator infrastructure | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity |
Both Phase Labs and Sanctum operate in the liquid staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Phase Labs is free to start and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.