Head-to-head · Liquid Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Phase Labs Phase Labs is a Solana staking infrastructure provider that issues phaseSOL, a liquid staking token representing SOL delegated through its validator setup. The hook is staking that stays liquid, so th... Sanctum Infinity Sanctum Infinity (INF) is a multi-LST liquidity pool that aggregates liquidity across Solana's entire liquid-staking ecosystem. Rather than backing one validator, INF is backed by a basket of many LST...
Both Phase Labs and Sanctum Infinity hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Phase Labs uses a free model, while Sanctum Infinity is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Phase Labs offers 5 features including phaseSOL liquid staking token, Non-custodial SOL staking, Enterprise-grade validator infrastructure, and 2 more. Sanctum Infinity counters with 5 features including Multi-LST liquidity pool aggregating the LST ecosystem, INF token backed by a basket of many LSTs, Instant, low-slippage swaps between supported LSTs, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Phase Labs currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum Infinity is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Phase Labs's key strengths include keeps staked sol liquid via phasesol, non-custodial; keys stay with the user, hardened validator and multisig security. Sanctum Infinity stands out for diversifies validator and protocol risk across lsts, provides deep instant-unstake liquidity, blended yield from multiple sources. On the flip side, Phase Labs's weaknesses include smaller lst with less liquidity than jito or marinade, while Sanctum Infinity's main drawback is exposure to the whole basket, including weaker lsts.
More comparisons
Compare Phase Labs with…
Compare Sanctum Infinity with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 81,071 |
| Categories | Liquid Staking | DeFi & Yield, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Solana liquid staking provider offering phaseSOL LST with enterprise-grade validator infrastructure | The infinite liquidity pool for all Solana liquid staking tokens |
Both Phase Labs and Sanctum Infinity operate in the liquid staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Phase Labs is free to start and Sanctum Infinity is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.