Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 11, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Quantstamp Quantstamp is a leading blockchain security firm providing smart contract audits, security assessments, and formal verification for Solana programs and dApps. Having audited over 750 projects securing... Reclaim Protocol Reclaim Protocol uses zkTLS infrastructure to let users prove facts about their Web2 data on-chain without exposing the underlying private information. It bridges the gap between the data people alrea...
Both Quantstamp and Reclaim Protocol hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Quantstamp uses a paid model, while Reclaim Protocol is freemium.
Quantstamp offers 6 features including Solana smart contract security audits, Rust and Anchor program analysis, Formal verification services, and 3 more. Reclaim Protocol counters with 5 features including zkTLS infrastructure for proving Web2 data on-chain, Zero-knowledge proofs that verify claims without exposing private data, Support for 250+ websites including bank, social, and ride data, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Quantstamp currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Reclaim Protocol is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Quantstamp's key strengths include industry-leading security reputation, deep expertise in solana and rust programs, extensive track record with major protocols. Reclaim Protocol stands out for lets users prove real-world data without revealing sensitive information, broad coverage across 250+ supported websites, backed by y combinator, polychain, and solana founders. On the flip side, Quantstamp's weaknesses include premium pricing for audit services, while Reclaim Protocol's main drawback is proofs depend on the structure and availability of source websites.
More comparisons
Compare Quantstamp with…
Compare Reclaim Protocol with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 78,672 | 8,446 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit, Developer Tools |
| Description | Blockchain security audits for Solana programs and dApps | Zero-knowledge proof identity verification for Solana dApps |
Both Quantstamp and Reclaim Protocol operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Quantstamp's pricing and Reclaim Protocol is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.