Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 25, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Range Range is a real-time security platform for blockchains, bridges, and rollups that inspects every transaction to detect exploits, fraud, and compliance risks. It is built for protocol teams and bridge... Reclaim Protocol Reclaim Protocol uses zkTLS infrastructure to let users prove facts about their Web2 data on-chain without exposing the underlying private information. It bridges the gap between the data people alrea...
Range is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Reclaim Protocol (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Range uses a paid model, while Reclaim Protocol is freemium.
Range offers 5 features including Real-time inspection of every transaction for exploits and fraud, Live threat intelligence for Solana protocols and bridges, Forensic explorers for tracing and investigating transactions, and 2 more. Reclaim Protocol counters with 5 features including zkTLS infrastructure for proving Web2 data on-chain, Zero-knowledge proofs that verify claims without exposing private data, Support for 250+ websites including bank, social, and ride data, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Range currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Reclaim Protocol is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Range's key strengths include promoted by the solana foundation in its 2026 defi security overhaul, real-time detection rather than after-the-fact analysis, cross-chain coverage suits bridge operators. Reclaim Protocol stands out for lets users prove real-world data without revealing sensitive information, broad coverage across 250+ supported websites, backed by y combinator, polychain, and solana founders.
More comparisons
Compare Range with…
Compare Reclaim Protocol with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 61 | 8,446 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit, Developer Tools |
| Description | Real-time security and transaction monitoring for Solana and cross-chain protocols | Zero-knowledge proof identity verification for Solana dApps |
Both Range and Reclaim Protocol operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Range has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Range's pricing and Reclaim Protocol is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.