Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 4 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Range Range is a real-time security platform for blockchains, bridges, and rollups that inspects every transaction to detect exploits, fraud, and compliance risks. It is built for protocol teams and bridge... Three Sigma Three Sigma is a Web3 security firm specializing in smart contract audits, economic risk modeling, and exploit prevention across multiple ecosystems including Solana. With 150+ audits completed protec...
Range is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Three Sigma (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Range uses a paid model, while Three Sigma is paid.
Range offers 5 features including Real-time inspection of every transaction for exploits and fraud, Live threat intelligence for Solana protocols and bridges, Forensic explorers for tracing and investigating transactions, and 2 more. Three Sigma counters with 4 features including Comprehensive Rust and Solana smart contract audits, Economic risk modeling for DeFi protocols, Threat modeling for CPI injection and signer vulnerabilities, and 1 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Range currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Three Sigma is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Range's key strengths include promoted by the solana foundation in its 2026 defi security overhaul, real-time detection rather than after-the-fact analysis, cross-chain coverage suits bridge operators. Three Sigma stands out for extensive audit track record with $10b+ protected, multi-chain rust expertise across solana, near, and polkadot. On the flip side, Range's weaknesses include aimed at protocols and operators, not end users, while Three Sigma's main drawback is not exclusively solana-focused.
More comparisons
Compare Range with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 61 | 13,094 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Real-time security and transaction monitoring for Solana and cross-chain protocols | Web3 security audits and economic risk modeling for Solana and beyond |
Both Range and Three Sigma operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Range has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Range's pricing and check Three Sigma's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.