Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Range Range is a real-time security platform for blockchains, bridges, and rollups that inspects every transaction to detect exploits, fraud, and compliance risks. It is built for protocol teams and bridge... Zellic Zellic is a premier blockchain security firm specializing in smart contract audits for Solana and other chains. Founded by veteran security researchers, Zellic has audited some of the most critical pr...
Both Range and Zellic hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Range uses a paid model, while Zellic is paid.
Range offers 5 features including Real-time inspection of every transaction for exploits and fraud, Live threat intelligence for Solana protocols and bridges, Forensic explorers for tracing and investigating transactions, and 2 more. Zellic counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits for Solana/Rust, Formal verification and symbolic analysis, Vulnerability research and responsible disclosure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Range currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Zellic is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Range's key strengths include promoted by the solana foundation in its 2026 defi security overhaul, real-time detection rather than after-the-fact analysis, cross-chain coverage suits bridge operators. Zellic stands out for audited top-tier protocols (wormhole, pyth, layerzero), deep solana/rust expertise, thorough manual review process. On the flip side, Range's weaknesses include aimed at protocols and operators, not end users, while Zellic's main drawback is premium pricing for audit engagements.
More comparisons
Compare Range with…
Compare Zellic with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 57 | 17,904 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Real-time security and transaction monitoring for Solana and cross-chain protocols | Elite smart contract security audits trusted by top Solana protocols |
Both Range and Zellic operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Range's pricing and check Zellic's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.