RedStone vs Supanode

Overview

RedStone RedStone is a fast-growing blockchain oracle protocol, live on Solana, that delivers price feeds with sub-3ms latency. Oracles are the critical bridge that brings off-chain price data on-chain, and Re... Supanode Supanode is a Solana infrastructure provider built around a low-latency Frankfurt edge, packaging RPC, real-time streaming, transaction landing, and historical data into one stack instead of forcing t...

Community Ratings

RedStone is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Supanode (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

RedStone uses a freemium model, while Supanode is paid.

Key Features

RedStone offers 5 features including Price feeds with sub-3ms latency, Modular architecture offering push, pull, and extractable value oracle models, Support for 110+ chains including Solana, and 2 more. Supanode counters with 7 features including Yellowstone gRPC streaming (accounts, transactions, slots, blocks) at ~3.8ms p99 from Frankfurt with server-side filtering, ShredStream: raw block shreds over UDP at ~0.4ms p99 delivery, TPU Sender: stake-weighted transaction submission direct to slot leaders, bypassing the public mempool under congestion, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RedStone currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Supanode is rated declining. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

RedStone's key strengths include sub-3ms latency reduces stale-price risk in defi, modular models let integrators pick the right delivery method, broad multi-chain reach across 110+ chains. Supanode stands out for frankfurt-based low-latency edge (sub-4ms grpc, sub-1ms shred delivery) suits latency-sensitive trading and mev workloads, stake-weighted tpu landing is independently benchmarked #1 of 18 submission services for getting transactions into blocks, integrated stack (rpc, streaming, transaction landing, indexing) avoids assembling multiple point vendors.