Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (7) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Fair |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
RPC Fast RPC Fast is a low-latency Solana RPC and data-streaming provider built for high-throughput, latency-sensitive applications. Its hook is delivering early on-chain signals and fast transaction routing f... Supanode Supanode is a Solana infrastructure provider built around a low-latency Frankfurt edge, packaging RPC, real-time streaming, transaction landing, and historical data into one stack instead of forcing t...
Supanode is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.9/5 for RPC Fast (7 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
RPC Fast uses a paid model — https://rpcfast.com/pricing, while Supanode is paid.
RPC Fast offers 5 features including Low-latency Solana RPC access, gRPC streaming (Yellowstone, Shredstream, Aperture), Direct validator shred intake, and 2 more. Supanode counters with 7 features including Yellowstone gRPC streaming (accounts, transactions, slots, blocks) at ~3.8ms p99 from Frankfurt with server-side filtering, ShredStream: raw block shreds over UDP at ~0.4ms p99 delivery, TPU Sender: stake-weighted transaction submission direct to slot leaders, bypassing the public mempool under congestion, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RPC Fast currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Supanode is rated fair. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
RPC Fast's key strengths include built for latency-critical trading workloads, multiple streaming options for raw data, early signal access ahead of block confirmation. Supanode stands out for frankfurt-based low-latency edge (sub-4ms grpc, sub-1ms shred delivery) suits latency-sensitive trading and mev workloads, stake-weighted tpu landing is independently benchmarked #1 of 18 submission services for getting transactions into blocks, integrated stack (rpc, streaming, transaction landing, indexing) avoids assembling multiple point vendors.
More comparisons
Compare RPC Fast with…
Compare Supanode with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 501 | 1,936 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | Data & Indexing, RPC Providers |
| Description | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. | Frankfurt-edge Solana RPC, gRPC streaming, ShredStream, and stake-weighted TPU transaction landing |
Both RPC Fast and Supanode operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Supanode has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check RPC Fast's pricing and check Supanode's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.