Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 17, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (6) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
RugCheck RugCheck is a token risk scanner for Solana and, according to its current site title, Fogo. It gives users a quick way to inspect reported token risk factors and offers API documentation for integrati... Reclaim Protocol Reclaim Protocol uses zkTLS infrastructure to let users prove facts about their Web2 data on-chain without exposing the underlying private information. It bridges the gap between the data people alrea...
RugCheck is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.7/5 stars across 6 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Reclaim Protocol (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
RugCheck uses a free model — Check current site and API documentation for usage limits and commercial terms; free access and API pricing were not fully verifiable in the static review., while Reclaim Protocol is freemium. RugCheck has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Reclaim Protocol's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
RugCheck offers 4 features including Token risk report for Solana assets, Risk-factor and score presentation, Public API documentation for integrations, and 1 more. Reclaim Protocol counters with 5 features including zkTLS infrastructure for proving Web2 data on-chain, Zero-knowledge proofs that verify claims without exposing private data, Support for 250+ websites including bank, social, and ride data, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. RugCheck currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Reclaim Protocol is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
RugCheck's key strengths include quick starting point for token due diligence, api documentation supports programmatic checks.
More comparisons
Compare RugCheck with…
Compare Reclaim Protocol with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 43,029 | 8,446 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit, Developer Tools |
| Description | Solana token risk scanner with report and API access | Zero-knowledge proof identity verification for Solana dApps |
Both RugCheck and Reclaim Protocol operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. RugCheck has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — RugCheck is free to start and Reclaim Protocol is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.