Head-to-head · Wallets
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Salmon Salmon is an open-source, community-owned Solana wallet delivered as a browser extension, built with an emphasis on transparency and security. Its standout feature is transaction simulation, which pre... Turnkey Turnkey provides enterprise-grade wallet infrastructure built by the team behind Coinbase Custody. Through a single API, developers can create wallets, sign transactions, and automate on-chain actions...
Salmon is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.5/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Turnkey (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Salmon uses a free model, while Turnkey is freemium. Salmon has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Turnkey's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Salmon offers 5 features including Open-source, community-owned Solana wallet browser extension, Transaction simulation to preview outcomes before signing, Full SPL token support, and 2 more. Turnkey counters with 5 features including Single API for wallet creation, signing, and on-chain automation, 50-100ms signing latency with 99.9% uptime, Solana Policy Engine for granular transaction and program rules, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Salmon currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Turnkey is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Salmon's key strengths include open, auditable code lets users verify how keys are handled, transaction simulation helps catch malicious actions before signing, community-owned framing aligns incentives with users. Turnkey stands out for low-latency signing suitable for high-volume applications, granular policy controls for transaction security guardrails, proven in production by well-known platforms.
More comparisons
Compare Salmon with…
Compare Turnkey with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 7,302 | 20,133 |
| Categories | Wallets | Wallets |
| Description | Open-source community Solana wallet with transaction simulation | Secure, flexible wallet infrastructure API for Solana apps |
Both Salmon and Turnkey operate in the wallets space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Salmon has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Salmon is free to start and Turnkey is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.