Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 9, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc... Crossmint Crossmint is a Web3 developer platform that provides APIs and SDKs for creating wallets, minting NFTs, and processing crypto payments — all designed to make blockchain integration accessible to tradit...
Crossmint is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.7/5 for Sanctum (3 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Sanctum uses a free model — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs., while Crossmint is freemium — Free tier available for development. Production pricing based on API calls and transaction volume. Enterprise plans with custom pricing.. Sanctum has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Crossmint's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Sanctum offers 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. Crossmint counters with 8 features including Wallet-as-a-service creating non-custodial wallets via API, NFT minting API with REST endpoints for simple integration, Fiat-to-NFT checkout supporting credit card purchases, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sanctum currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Crossmint is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare Sanctum with…
Compare Crossmint with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 81,134 | 31,407 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | Developer Tools |
| Description | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity | Web3 developer tools for wallets, NFTs, and payments |
Sanctum's key strengths include solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts. Crossmint stands out for makes blockchain integration accessible to traditional web developers, wallet-as-a-service removes the biggest web3 onboarding friction, credit card nft purchases open market to non-crypto users. On the flip side, Sanctum's weaknesses include smart contract risk across the multi-lst pool infrastructure, while Crossmint's main drawback is abstraction layer means developers learn less about underlying blockchain.
While Sanctum (DeFi & Yield) and Crossmint (Developer Tools) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Crossmint has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Sanctum is free to start and Crossmint is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.