Shyft vs Supra

Overview

Shyft Shyft provides Solana data APIs and indexing services designed for developers building applications that need reliable, fast access to on-chain data. The platform offers both real-time and historical... Supra Supra (formerly SupraOracles) is a cross-chain oracle and automation network that supports Solana alongside EVM and Move-based chains. Its primary role is to deliver reliable external data — particula...

Community Ratings

Supra is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Shyft (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

Shyft uses a freemium model — Free tier available. Paid plans start at $49/mo for higher limits and premium features., while Supra is free. Supra has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Shyft's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.

Key Features

Shyft offers 8 features including Parsed transaction APIs with human-readable event data, Token and NFT metadata APIs with ownership and transfer history, Real-time webhook callbacks for on-chain event monitoring, and 5 more. Supra counters with 5 features including Native Solana price feeds with cross-chain support, On-chain verifiable random function (VRF), Automation for triggering on-chain actions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Shyft currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Supra is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

Shyft's key strengths include parsed apis dramatically simplify working with solana transaction data, flexible webhook system enables real-time features without polling, both graphql and rest options accommodate different developer preferences.