Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Fair | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Supanode Supanode is a Solana infrastructure provider built around a low-latency Frankfurt edge, packaging RPC, real-time streaming, transaction landing, and historical data into one stack instead of forcing t... Triton One Triton One is a Solana RPC and data infrastructure provider that runs bare-metal RPC nodes, real-time streaming, transaction landing, and full historical ledger access for high-throughput applications...
Both Supanode and Triton One hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Supanode uses a paid model, while Triton One is paid — Shared RPC plans start at $100/month. Dedicated nodes available at custom pricing..
Supanode offers 7 features including Yellowstone gRPC streaming (accounts, transactions, slots, blocks) at ~3.8ms p99 from Frankfurt with server-side filtering, ShredStream: raw block shreds over UDP at ~0.4ms p99 delivery, TPU Sender: stake-weighted transaction submission direct to slot leaders, bypassing the public mempool under congestion, and 4 more. Triton One counters with 5 features including Yellowstone gRPC (Dragon's Mouth) streaming — the open-source Geyser interface authored and maintained by Triton, delivering real-time slot, block, transaction, and account updates, Dedicated bare-metal nodes and clusters with custom tuning, isolated streaming capacity, and choice of region across 3 continents, Shared RPC pools across 10+ data centres with GeoDNS routing, continuous health checks, and instantaneous failover (99.99% uptime claim), and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Supanode currently has a fair health status. Triton One is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare Supanode with…
Compare Triton One with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,936 | 7,875 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, RPC Providers | RPC Providers |
| Description | Frankfurt-edge Solana RPC, gRPC streaming, ShredStream, and stake-weighted TPU transaction landing | Enterprise-grade Solana RPC infrastructure with DAS API support |
Supanode's key strengths include frankfurt-based low-latency edge (sub-4ms grpc, sub-1ms shred delivery) suits latency-sensitive trading and mev workloads, stake-weighted tpu landing is independently benchmarked #1 of 18 submission services for getting transactions into blocks, integrated stack (rpc, streaming, transaction landing, indexing) avoids assembling multiple point vendors. Triton One stands out for created and maintains yellowstone grpc, the de facto open-source standard most of the solana streaming ecosystem is built on, bare-metal dedicated infrastructure with multi-region options for predictable, low-jitter performance, pay-as-you-go and invoiced billing with flexible rps and connection limits rather than rigid public tiers. On the flip side, Supanode's weaknesses include crypto-only (usdc) prepaid billing, with no published support for card payments, while Triton One's main drawback is public pricing is limited; dedicated nodes, archival storage, and multi-region setups require custom quotes.
Both Supanode and Triton One operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Supanode's pricing and check Triton One's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.