Axiom's default fee is 0.95% net (1% gross with 0.05% cashback at the entry tier). BullX charges a flat 1% with no rebate. But fees tell only half the story. Axiom's reputation took a serious hit in February 2026 after blockchain investigator ZachXBT published evidence of insider trading by employees using internal dashboards with access to user data. Here's what you actually need to know before picking one.
Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you sign up through them, MadeOnSol may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never affects our rankings, ratings, or reviews.
Update — June 2026: BullX has shut down its services. This comparison is kept for reference, but BullX is no longer an option. If you're choosing a terminal now, see our best BullX alternatives for where traders are migrating.
Axiom and BullX are both web-first trading terminals for Solana. They look similar on the surface — charts, screener, multi-wallet support, Jito bundles. But 2026 has sharpened the differences between them in ways that matter for traders choosing a primary platform.
Axiom has a lower fee and a powerful feature set. It also had a rough first half of 2026 after community allegations of insider front-running. BullX has a higher fee but a cleaner reputation and a more polished multi-chain interface. Here's the honest comparison.
Axiom uses a tiered cashback system: gross fee is 1% on every trade, with SOL cashback returned based on your accumulated volume tier (Wood → Champion). The entry tier (Wood) nets 0.95%; Gold tier nets 0.85%; Champion tier nets 0.75%.
| Axiom (Wood/default) | Axiom (Gold tier) | BullX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross fee | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Net fee | 0.95% | 0.85% | 1.0% |
| Monthly cost at $10K volume | $95 | $85 | $100 |
| Monthly cost at $50K volume | $475 | $425 | $500 |
| Monthly cost at $100K volume | $950 | $850 | $1,000 |
At the default tier, Axiom saves $600/year vs BullX at $100K volume. Higher tiers save more. That's real money, but it's not the whole picture here.
On February 26, 2026, blockchain investigator ZachXBT published findings that Axiom employees had used internal "God mode" dashboards — which gave them access to live user wallet data, linked account identifiers, and trade histories — to front-run high-profile traders. They monitored users' undisclosed wallets, bought ahead of their disclosed trades, and sold into user demand. The scheme allegedly ran for approximately 10 months and generated around $400,000 in profits.
Axiom acknowledged the breach, removed access to the internal tools, and stated they were "surprised and disappointed." As of mid-2026, no public confirmation of employee terminations or regulatory outcome has been documented.
Tools mentioned
Live health scores, average ratings, and direct links on MadeOnSol.
Serverless, non-custodial desktop terminal for launching and bundling Solana memecoins — private keys never leave your machine.
Embeddable swap widget powered by Jupiter for any Solana dApp
Peer-to-peer perpetual futures DEX on Solana with customizable trading pairs
All-in-one crypto exchange and Web3 wallet with a multi-chain DEX aggregator across 400+ DEXs.
Multi-chain DEX with Solana cross-chain swap support
Build your own trading bot
KOL copy-trading, deployer sniping, and DEX trade streaming — all via API.
New customers try Pro free for 5 days — card, cancel anytime.
import { MadeOnSol } from "madeonsol";
const client = new MadeOnSol({ apiKey: "msk_your_key" });
// Mirror KOL trades in real-time
const { trades } = await client.kol.feed({ action: "buy" });
// Set up webhooks for instant alerts
const webhook = await client.webhooks.create({
url: "https://your-bot.com/hook",
events: ["kol:trade", "deployer:alert"],
});Keep reading
Comparisons
BullX has shut down its services. If you were trading on BullX, here are the 5 best alternatives for Solana — ranked by fees, speed, and features, with a clear recommendation for every trading style.
Reviews
Trojan charges 0.9% and shares 35% of fees with holders. BullX charges 1% and keeps everything. That's the headline — but the real differences are in execution speed, interface, and who each bot is actually built for.
Comparisons
Axiom is a strong trading terminal, but the February 2026 insider trading controversy pushed many traders to look elsewhere. Here are the five best Axiom alternatives ranked by fee, speed, features, and trust — with a clear pick for every trading style.
Reviews
An honest review of BonkBot, the Telegram trading bot that helped kick off Solana's meme-coin trading wave. Covers features, the 1% fee and BONK buyback mechanism, security history, and how it stacks up in 2026.
Reviews
FluxBot is a Solana Foundation-backed Telegram bot built by the same team behind RugCheck, charging a flat 0.75% fee with native rug-scan integration. Here's what it does well, what's still on the roadmap, and how its FLUXB reward token actually works.
Reviews
Both charge 1% per trade. So how do you choose? GMGN is a copy-trading and wallet-tracking powerhouse. Photon is a pure-speed web trading terminal. The right pick depends entirely on how you trade.
Enjoyed this article?
Real-time KOL trades, Pump.fun deployer intel, and 1,200+ ranked Solana tools — free to explore.
Open the KOL TrackerWhat this means practically: the core issue was unrestricted internal access to user data, not just screener exploitation. It's a structural trust question about Axiom's internal controls. If you trade under a pseudonymous identity or hold significant positions you'd prefer to keep private, that context matters.
BullX has no comparable controversy on record.
Both platforms are web-first with Telegram companions.
Axiom is built around the screener — its primary discovery surface is a real-time token feed with 15+ filters (MC, liquidity, volume, age, holder count, dev holdings, LP status). The trade panel sits alongside the chart. Axiom was one of the first Solana bots to deeply integrate token metadata (socials, deployer history, holder distribution) into the trading view.
BullX has a comparable screener and charting setup, plus stronger multi-chain coverage. It has invested more in the portfolio management layer — cross-chain position tracking, PnL across wallets, and a cleaner unified view for traders who operate across Solana, Ethereum, and Base simultaneously.
| Feature | Axiom | BullX |
|---|---|---|
| Web terminal | ✅ | ✅ |
| Telegram bot | ✅ | ✅ |
| Live charts | ✅ | ✅ |
| Token screener | ✅ Advanced | ✅ |
| Copy trading | ✅ | ✅ |
| Limit orders | ✅ | ✅ |
| DCA | ✅ | ✅ |
| Auto-buy (new launches) | ✅ | ✅ |
| Anti-MEV / Jito bundles | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multi-chain | ✅ (SOL, ETH, BASE) | ✅ (multi-chain) |
| Deployer / dev info in UI | ✅ | ✅ |
| Net fee (default tier) | 0.95% | 1.0% |
| Fee rebate | ❌ | ❌ |
Both platforms are genuinely fast. Axiom has historically been strong on new-token snipes — it was one of the first platforms to integrate deshred-level pre-confirm alerts for Pump.fun launches. BullX has improved its snipe engine significantly and is now competitive.
For regular swaps, both are fast enough that the platform's latency is rarely your bottleneck. Priority fee configuration and network congestion matter more. Traders who want automated entries beyond either terminal's built-in DCA can roll their own — our guide on building a Solana dip-buying bot with sub-second price alerts shows how to trigger buys the moment a token dips.
Axiom's screener has more filter options by count and surfaces token data (dev wallet %, insider activity, holder concentration) that BullX doesn't match depth-for-depth. If token-level due diligence inside the screener is important to you, Axiom's data layer is richer — and useful for spotting the fake activity covered in our guide to how Solana volume bots work and how to spot them.
BullX's screener covers the essentials (MC, volume, liquidity, age) cleanly and with a fast refresh rate. It doesn't go as deep on on-chain token analytics. If your shortlist is BullX against a fee-cheaper Telegram bot rather than Axiom, our Trojan vs BullX comparison covers that match-up.
Both platforms support non-custodial trading via wallet connection — you sign transactions from your own wallet, the platform never holds your keys. This is the recommended setup for either platform with significant funds.
For Telegram use (quick mobile trades), both store a session key server-side — standard for the category.
On pure features and fees, Axiom is the better deal — lower net fee (0.95% default vs 1%), deeper screener, volume-based cashback tiers. The February 2026 ZachXBT exposure is the asterisk.
If you're comfortable with how Axiom responded to the insider trading findings and trust their platform controls going forward, it's the better choice on objective criteria. If internal access to user data being misused concerns you — especially if you trade under a pseudonymous identity — BullX is the safer pick even at a higher fee. And if the controversy pushed you off Axiom entirely, we round up the strongest replacements in our best Axiom alternatives guide.
The good news: you can run both simultaneously. Most serious traders don't pick just one.
Axiom is operational and has not reported any security breaches or wallet compromises. The 2026 controversy was about alleged insider trading practices, not a platform hack. Your funds on Axiom (non-custodial mode) are as safe as your own wallet.
On February 26, 2026, ZachXBT published evidence that Axiom employees used internal "God mode" dashboards — giving them access to live user wallet data and linked account identifiers — to front-run high-profile traders' positions. The scheme allegedly ran for ~10 months and generated ~$400,000 in profits. Axiom acknowledged the issue, removed the internal tool access, and committed to an internal investigation. The outcome of that investigation has not been made public.
At $50K/month volume, that's $75/month. Whether that's worth it depends on how much the trust factor weighs on you. If you're comfortable with Axiom, no. If you're not, yes.
Both support copy trading. GMGN is the recognized leader in copy trading on Solana; if that's your primary use case, GMGN is a stronger choice than either Axiom or BullX.
Yes. Many traders use one for discovery/screening and the other for execution. There's no technical or practical reason to use only one.
See our Padre vs Axiom comparison for a multi-chain alternative, or how to use Axiom for a full setup walkthrough.
For the wider field — Photon, Padre, GMGN, MevX, and Light Terminal alongside these two — see our full trading terminal comparison.