Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (4) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Anchor Anchor is the standard development framework for building Solana programs (smart contracts), used by the vast majority of Solana developers. Created by Armani Ferrante, Anchor provides a Rust-based fr... GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1...
Both Anchor and GetBlock hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Anchor uses a free model — Free and open source., while GetBlock is freemium. Anchor has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though GetBlock's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Anchor offers 8 features including Declarative Rust macros for simplified Solana program development, Automatic account serialization and deserialization, Built-in account constraint validation and security checks, and 5 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Anchor currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Anchor's key strengths include industry standard — used by the vast majority of solana programs, dramatically reduces solana development complexity and boilerplate, strong security defaults catch common vulnerabilities automatically. GetBlock stands out for broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. On the flip side, Anchor's weaknesses include abstraction adds overhead — programs are slightly larger than hand-written native code, while GetBlock's main drawback is general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains.
More comparisons
Compare Anchor with…
Compare GetBlock with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 5 |
| Twitter Followers | 7,998 | 23,949 |
| Categories | SDKs & Libraries, Developer Tools | RPC Providers |
| Description | The standard framework for building Solana programs | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics |
While Anchor (SDKs & Libraries) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Anchor is free to start and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.