Head-to-head · Developer Tools
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 25, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Arweave Arweave is a decentralized permanent storage network widely used by Solana projects for immutable, long-lived data storage. Its core innovation is a pay-once, store-forever model: instead of recurring... Reclaim Protocol Reclaim Protocol uses zkTLS infrastructure to let users prove facts about their Web2 data on-chain without exposing the underlying private information. It bridges the gap between the data people alrea...
Arweave is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Reclaim Protocol (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Arweave uses a paid model, while Reclaim Protocol is freemium.
Arweave offers 5 features including Pay-once, store-forever permanent data storage, Endowment-based economic model funding long-term persistence, Powers Solana NFT image and metadata permanence, and 2 more. Reclaim Protocol counters with 5 features including zkTLS infrastructure for proving Web2 data on-chain, Zero-knowledge proofs that verify claims without exposing private data, Support for 250+ websites including bank, social, and ride data, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Arweave currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Reclaim Protocol is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Arweave's key strengths include single upfront payment instead of recurring storage fees, immutable, censorship-resistant storage for critical nft and app data, well-integrated with solana minting workflows via irys. Reclaim Protocol stands out for lets users prove real-world data without revealing sensitive information, broad coverage across 250+ supported websites, backed by y combinator, polychain, and solana founders.
More comparisons
Compare Arweave with…
Compare Reclaim Protocol with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 107,600 | 8,446 |
| Categories | Developer Tools | Security & Audit, Developer Tools |
| Description | Permanent decentralized storage for Solana data and NFT assets | Zero-knowledge proof identity verification for Solana dApps |
Both Arweave and Reclaim Protocol operate in the developer tools space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Arweave has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Arweave's pricing and Reclaim Protocol is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.