Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (4) |
| Pricing | Token Gated | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
attn.markets attn.markets is a Solana credit protocol that lets token creators borrow against their on-chain fee revenue. In plain terms, it turns a recurring revenue stream, such as Pump.fun creator fees, into up... Sandglass Sandglass is a yield tokenization protocol on Solana that splits yield-bearing assets into two separate instruments: principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT). By separating the principal from the f...
Sandglass is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.8/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for attn.markets (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
attn.markets uses a token gated model, while Sandglass is free. Sandglass has the edge for budget-conscious users, though attn.markets's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
attn.markets offers 5 features including Credit against on-chain creator fee revenue, Fee-history indexing and credit-limit estimation, SOL-denominated borrowing limits, and 2 more. Sandglass counters with 5 features including Splits yield-bearing assets into principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT), Fixed-rate yield locking via discounted principal tokens, Leveraged yield trading for amplified yield exposure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. attn.markets currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sandglass is rated healthy with 99.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
attn.markets's key strengths include lets creators access liquidity without selling tokens, yield sourced from fee revenue, not just price action, transparent, on-chain fee history as collateral basis. Sandglass stands out for brings pendle-style yield tokenization natively to solana, enables predictable fixed-rate returns through pt, supports both lst and lending yields as sources.
More comparisons
Compare attn.markets with…
Compare Sandglass with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 551 | 3,207 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Lock revenues, mint liquidity, earn uncorrelated yields on Solana | Yield tokenization protocol for Solana DeFi strategies |
Both attn.markets and Sandglass operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Sandglass has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check attn.markets's pricing and Sandglass is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.