Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Axiom Axiom is an ultra-fast Solana trading terminal designed for professional and semi-professional traders who demand the lowest possible latency and the most advanced execution features. It has quickly g... Lulo Lulo is a Solana-native lending aggregator that automatically routes your stablecoin and token deposits to the highest-yielding lending protocols on Solana — including Kamino, Drift, Save (formerly So...
Axiom is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Lulo (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Axiom uses a freemium model — Free to use. 1% base trading fee with tiered SOL cashback: Explorer (0.9%), Hunter (0.8%), Trader (0.7%), Champion (0.6%). Referral codes give 10-20% additional discount., while Lulo is freemium — Free to deposit and withdraw. Lulo takes a small performance fee on the additional yield generated through optimization. No management fees.. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Axiom offers 8 features including Ultra-low latency trading execution optimized for Solana, Real-time token scanning and new launch detection, Advanced charting with multiple timeframes and technical indicators, and 5 more. Lulo counters with 8 features including Automatic hourly rebalancing across Kamino, Drift, Save, and MarginFi, Two deposit modes: Cash (~5% APY with protection) and High Yield (~7%+ APY), Lulo Protect — optional deposit insurance against underlying protocol failures, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Axiom currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Lulo is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare Axiom with…
Compare Lulo with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 80,270 | 17,722 |
| Categories | Trading Bots | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Y Combinator-backed all-in-one Solana trading terminal with non-custodial wallets, wallet tracking, and tiered cashback fees. | Solana lending aggregator that auto-routes deposits to the highest yield protocols |
Axiom's key strengths include among the fastest trading terminals on solana for execution speed, comprehensive feature set rivaling the best web terminals and telegram bots, professional-grade tools suitable for serious active traders. Lulo stands out for zero fees — extremely rare for a yield aggregator in defi, set-and-forget simplicity with automatic protocol rebalancing, lulo protect adds a safety layer not found in most defi yield tools. On the flip side, Axiom's weaknesses include complex interface has a steeper learning curve for beginners, while Lulo's main drawback is exact allocation weights across underlying protocols are not always transparent.
While Axiom (Trading Bots) and Lulo (DeFi & Yield) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Axiom has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Axiom is free to start and Lulo is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.