Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Jupiter Jupiter is Solana's dominant DEX aggregator and the central hub for decentralized trading on the network. Processing billions of dollars in monthly volume, Jupiter routes trades across dozens of liqui... Lulo Lulo is a Solana-native lending aggregator that automatically routes your stablecoin and token deposits to the highest-yielding lending protocols on Solana — including Kamino, Drift, Save (formerly So...
Jupiter is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Lulo (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Jupiter uses a free model — Free to use for swaps. Small platform fees on perps (0.1% taker, 0.01% maker). JUP token used for governance., while Lulo is freemium — Free to deposit and withdraw. Lulo takes a small performance fee on the additional yield generated through optimization. No management fees.. Jupiter has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Lulo's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Jupiter offers 8 features including DEX aggregation across 20+ Solana liquidity sources for best-price routing, Perpetual futures trading (Jupiter Perps) with up to 100x leverage, Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) with customizable intervals and amounts, and 5 more. Lulo counters with 8 features including Automatic hourly rebalancing across Kamino, Drift, Save, and MarginFi, Two deposit modes: Cash (~5% APY with protection) and High Yield (~7%+ APY), Lulo Protect — optional deposit insurance against underlying protocol failures, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Jupiter currently has a healthy health status with 99.2% uptime over the last 30 days. Lulo is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare Jupiter with…
Compare Lulo with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 617,120 | 17,722 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | The best swap aggregator and DeFi hub on Solana | Solana lending aggregator that auto-routes deposits to the highest yield protocols |
Jupiter's key strengths include best swap prices on solana through intelligent multi-dex routing, comprehensive defi suite — swaps, perps, dca, limit orders in one platform, free for standard swaps with no platform fee on basic trades. Lulo stands out for zero fees — extremely rare for a yield aggregator in defi, set-and-forget simplicity with automatic protocol rebalancing, lulo protect adds a safety layer not found in most defi yield tools. On the flip side, Jupiter's weaknesses include perps and advanced features have a learning curve for defi beginners, while Lulo's main drawback is exact allocation weights across underlying protocols are not always transparent.
While Jupiter (DEXs & Swaps) and Lulo (DeFi & Yield) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. Jupiter has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Jupiter is free to start and Lulo is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.