Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 10, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Unknown | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
AYZO AYZO is a multichain on-chain research platform for investigating wallet activity, token holders, and funding sources across 15+ networks including Solana, Ethereum, Base, and Bitcoin, with no wallet... Range Range is a real-time security platform for blockchains, bridges, and rollups that inspects every transaction to detect exploits, fraud, and compliance risks. It is built for protocol teams and bridge...
Range is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for AYZO (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
AYZO uses a freemium model, while Range is paid.
AYZO offers 5 features including 15+ blockchain coverage including Solana, Ethereum, Base, and Bitcoin, Holder-concentration analysis with coverage transparency, Wallet-connection tracking via observed transactions, and 2 more. Range counters with 5 features including Real-time inspection of every transaction for exploits and fraud, Live threat intelligence for Solana protocols and bridges, Forensic explorers for tracing and investigating transactions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. AYZO currently has a unknown health status. Range is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
AYZO's key strengths include conservative, evidence-based reporting instead of unproven ownership claims, coverage limitations stay attached to every finding, free tier available with no signup friction (3 analyses/24h). Range stands out for promoted by the solana foundation in its 2026 defi security overhaul, real-time detection rather than after-the-fact analysis, cross-chain coverage suits bridge operators.
More comparisons
Compare AYZO with…
Compare Range with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 60 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Evidence-first wallet and token intelligence across 15+ chains, including Solana | Real-time security and transaction monitoring for Solana and cross-chain protocols |
Both AYZO and Range operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Range has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — AYZO is free to start and check Range's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.