Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
BlazeStake BlazeStake is a fully non-custodial Solana liquid staking protocol supported by the Solana Foundation. Users stake SOL and receive bSOL tokens that appreciate in value over time based on staking rewar... Picasso Network Picasso Network enables SOL restaking to secure Actively Validated Services and provides trust-minimized IBC connections between Solana and Cosmos ecosystems. Supports SOL, mSOL, jitoSOL, and bSOL for...
BlazeStake is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Picasso Network (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
BlazeStake uses a free model — No platform fees. Standard Solana validator commission applies to staking rewards., while Picasso Network is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
BlazeStake offers 5 features including Liquid staking with instant unstake — no 2-3 day waiting period, bSOL tokens usable across DeFi protocols while earning staking rewards, Most decentralized Solana stake pool with 271 active validators, and 2 more. Picasso Network counters with 5 features including SOL and LST restaking for AVS security, IBC bridge connecting Solana to Cosmos, Fee-sharing model for stakers and restakers, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. BlazeStake currently has a healthy health status with 91.7% uptime over the last 30 days. Picasso Network is rated healthy with 28.1% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
BlazeStake's key strengths include instant unstaking removes the typical multi-day cooldown period, most decentralized stake pool on solana, supporting network health, non-custodial and audited by multiple firms with solana foundation backing.
More comparisons
Compare BlazeStake with…
Compare Picasso Network with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 22,382 | — |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | Staking, Bridges |
| Description | Decentralized liquid staking for Solana — stake SOL, receive bSOL, and stay liquid across DeFi. | Solana restaking protocol enabling IBC cross-chain connections to Cosmos |
Both BlazeStake and Picasso Network operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. BlazeStake has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — BlazeStake is free to start and Picasso Network is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.