BlazeStake vs Sanctum
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 22,741 | 80,803 |
| Categories | Liquid Staking, Staking, DeFi & Yield | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Decentralized liquid staking for Solana — stake SOL, receive bSOL, and stay liquid across DeFi. | Liquid staking infrastructure unifying Solana LSTs |
Pros & Cons
BlazeStake
- Instant unstaking removes the typical multi-day cooldown period
- Most decentralized stake pool on Solana, supporting network health
- Non-custodial and audited by multiple firms with Solana Foundation backing
- Smaller TVL compared to Marinade and Jito liquid staking
- bSOL has fewer DeFi integrations than more established LSTs like mSOL or jitoSOL
- Staking yields are variable and depend on network-wide Solana staking returns
Sanctum
BlazeStake vs Sanctum: Which Should You Choose?
Both BlazeStake and Sanctum are rated similarly by the community.
Pricing: BlazeStake is free while Sanctum is free.
Health & Reliability: BlazeStake has a healthy health status (100/100) while Sanctum is rated healthy (100/100).
Feature set: BlazeStake offers 5 features and Sanctum offers 7 features. Check their individual pages for detailed feature breakdowns and user reviews.