Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Blowfish Blowfish is a transaction simulation and fraud prevention platform for Solana and other blockchains that helps wallets, dApps, and users understand what will happen before they sign a transaction. It... Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems....
Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Blowfish (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Blowfish uses a freemium model — Free for end users via wallet integrations. Developer API has usage-based pricing., while Hacken is paid.
Blowfish offers 8 features including Transaction simulation with human-readable outcome previews, Malicious transaction detection including drainer and phishing patterns, Integration with major wallets as backend security infrastructure, and 5 more. Hacken counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Blowfish currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hacken is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Blowfish's key strengths include protects millions of users through wallet integrations (phantom and others), human-readable transaction previews catch risks that users would miss, has prevented hundreds of millions in potential fraud losses. Hacken stands out for broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains.
More comparisons
Compare Blowfish with…
Compare Hacken with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 10,736 | 133,975 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Transaction simulation and fraud prevention for Solana wallets | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise |
Both Blowfish and Hacken operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Hacken has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Blowfish is free to start and check Hacken's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.