Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 9, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (4) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Cesto Cesto is a non-custodial investment platform on Solana that lets anyone buy a diversified, themed basket of assets in a single transaction instead of hunting down and swapping each position by hand. A... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.8/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 4.7/5 for Cesto (3 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Cesto uses a freemium model, while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Sanctum has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Cesto's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Cesto offers 6 features including One-click purchase of multi-asset baskets (tokens, tokenized stocks/RWAs, protocol positions), Fully non-custodial — every asset settles directly into your own wallet, Themed/narrative baskets built around sectors, events, or public figures, and 3 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Cesto currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Cesto's key strengths include keeps you in full custody of every asset — no pooled or custodial risk, diversified exposure in a single transaction lowers friction and gas vs manual swaps, built on established solana infrastructure (jupiter, kamino, jito) for deep liquidity and low fees.
More comparisons
Compare Cesto with…
Compare Sanctum with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 30,179 | 80,714 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Portfolio Trackers | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | One-click, non-custodial thematic investment baskets on Solana | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity |
Both Cesto and Sanctum operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Cesto is free to start and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.