Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 20, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (4) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
constant-k constant-k (Kaldera) is a high-performance Solana infrastructure provider delivering low-latency RPC endpoints and Yellowstone gRPC streaming. It runs dedicated nodes across multiple regions, includin... FluxRPC FluxRPC is a performance-focused RPC provider for Solana — and the emerging Fogo chain — that architecturally separates the RPC serving layer from the validator. Decoupling the two lets it tune, cache...
FluxRPC is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.8/5 for constant-k (4 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
constant-k uses a paid model, while FluxRPC is freemium — Freemium 15 RPS. Free tier includes 10GB bandwidth, 15 RPS, WebSockets and Lantern local caching. Paid plans from $38/month, the cheapest includes 100 RPS and Yellowstone gRPC streaming. All plans include WebSockets. Bandwidth is only charged if your plan goes over..
constant-k offers 5 features including Low-latency Solana JSON-RPC endpoints across multiple regions (Frankfurt and New York), Yellowstone gRPC streaming for real-time account and transaction data, Low-latency shred-level (deshred) streams that surface activity ahead of confirmed blocks, and 2 more. FluxRPC counters with 8 features including Solana and Fogo RPC endpoints, Yellowstone gRPC at $38/mo, gRPC, WebSockets, and full RPC in one plan, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. constant-k currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. FluxRPC is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
constant-k's key strengths include multi-region nodes let you connect to the closest endpoint for minimal latency, yellowstone grpc plus deshred streams suit snipers, copy-trading, and data pipelines, competitively priced — among the more affordable grpc providers, with crypto-friendly tiered plans.
More comparisons
Compare constant-k with…
Compare FluxRPC with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 4 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 229 | 1,618 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, RPC Providers | Developer Tools, RPC Providers |
| Description | Multi-region Solana RPC and Yellowstone gRPC streaming for latency-sensitive trading | gRPC, WebSockets, and full RPC in one plan from $38/mo. No credits, no multipliers, no add-ons and nothing gated behind a higher tier. |
Both constant-k and FluxRPC operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. FluxRPC has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check constant-k's pricing and FluxRPC is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.