Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (4) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
constant-k constant-k (Kaldera) is a high-performance Solana infrastructure provider delivering low-latency RPC endpoints and Yellowstone gRPC streaming. It runs dedicated nodes across multiple regions, includin... Switchboard Switchboard is a decentralized oracle network on Solana that enables any developer to create custom data feeds for on-chain applications. Unlike Pyth which focuses on institutional financial data, Swi...
Switchboard is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.8/5 for constant-k (4 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
constant-k uses a paid model, while Switchboard is freemium — Free to use existing feeds. Creating custom feeds requires staking tokens. Oracle node operators earn rewards for serving data..
constant-k offers 5 features including Low-latency Solana JSON-RPC endpoints across multiple regions (Frankfurt and New York), Yellowstone gRPC streaming for real-time account and transaction data, Low-latency shred-level (deshred) streams that surface activity ahead of confirmed blocks, and 2 more. Switchboard counters with 8 features including Permissionless oracle creation for any off-chain data source, Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) secured oracle operators, Custom data feeds from APIs, websites, and any data source, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. constant-k currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Switchboard is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
constant-k's key strengths include multi-region nodes let you connect to the closest endpoint for minimal latency, yellowstone grpc plus deshred streams suit snipers, copy-trading, and data pipelines, competitively priced — among the more affordable grpc providers, with crypto-friendly tiered plans.
More comparisons
Compare constant-k with…
Compare Switchboard with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 4 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 218 | 93,111 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, RPC Providers | Data & Indexing, Oracles |
| Description | Multi-region Solana RPC and Yellowstone gRPC streaming for latency-sensitive trading | Decentralized oracle network for customizable data feeds |
Both constant-k and Switchboard operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Switchboard has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check constant-k's pricing and Switchboard is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.