Covalent vs GetBlock
Last updated: April 11, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Unknown | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 23,989 |
| Categories | API Platforms | RPC Providers |
| Description | Unified multi-chain blockchain data API | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics |
Pros & Cons
Covalent
- Deep Solana coverage
- No-code SQL interface
- Generous free tier
- Strong NFT data endpoints
- Rate limits on free tier
- Primarily read-only historical data
GetBlock
- Generous free tier for testing
- Multi-chain support from one provider
- Simple setup and API key management
- Shared nodes have variable latency
- Dedicated nodes are expensive for small projects
Covalent vs GetBlock: Which Should You Choose?
Overview
Covalent Covalent provides a unified API for querying on-chain data across 200+ blockchains including Solana. Structured endpoints for token balances, NFT metadata, transaction history, and DeFi data without r... GetBlock GetBlock offers Solana RPC access through both shared and dedicated node plans. With 130+ blockchain networks supported, it provides a simple API dashboard, request analytics, and flexible pricing tha...
Community Ratings
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Covalent (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Pricing & Value
Covalent uses a freemium model, while GetBlock is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Key Features
Covalent offers 6 features including Token balances and transfers, NFT metadata and events, Transaction history, and 3 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Shared and dedicated Solana nodes, 130+ blockchain networks, Request analytics dashboard, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
Reliability & Health
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Covalent currently has a unknown health status. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For tools you rely on daily — especially trading bots or wallets — uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Strengths
Covalent's key strengths include deep solana coverage, no-code sql interface, generous free tier. GetBlock stands out for generous free tier for testing, multi-chain support from one provider, simple setup and api key management. On the flip side, Covalent's weaknesses include rate limits on free tier, while GetBlock's main drawback is shared nodes have variable latency.
The Verdict
While Covalent (API Platforms) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. GetBlock has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Covalent is free to start and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.