Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Cyfrin Cyfrin is a leading smart contract security audit firm that has secured over $50 billion in TVL across multiple blockchains including Solana. The firm conducts thorough manual code reviews of Solana p... Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems....
Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Cyfrin (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Cyfrin uses a paid model, while Hacken is paid.
Cyfrin offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits for Solana/Rust, Free Solana Development Course on Updraft, $50B+ TVL secured across chains, and 2 more. Hacken counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Cyfrin currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hacken is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Cyfrin's key strengths include industry-leading audit reputation, free developer education platform, deep solana/rust expertise. Hacken stands out for broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. On the flip side, Cyfrin's weaknesses include audit waitlists can be long, while Hacken's main drawback is enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve).
More comparisons
Compare Cyfrin with…
Compare Hacken with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 16,195 | 133,975 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Smart contract security audits and free developer education for Solana and Rust programs | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise |
Both Cyfrin and Hacken operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Hacken has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Cyfrin's pricing and check Hacken's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.