Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Elliptic Elliptic provides blockchain analytics, compliance screening, and risk-management solutions covering Solana and 40+ blockchains. It is established compliance infrastructure for institutions. Its tool... Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems....
Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Elliptic (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Elliptic uses a paid model, while Hacken is paid.
Elliptic offers 5 features including Blockchain analytics across Solana and 40+ chains, Compliance screening and transaction monitoring, AML/KYC tooling, and 2 more. Hacken counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Elliptic currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hacken is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Elliptic's key strengths include established institutional compliance platform, broad multi-chain coverage including solana, trusted by regulated entities. Hacken stands out for broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. On the flip side, Elliptic's weaknesses include enterprise compliance product, not for retail, while Hacken's main drawback is enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve).
More comparisons
Compare Elliptic with…
Compare Hacken with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 18,657 | 133,975 |
| Categories | Security & Audit, Analytics & Charts | Security & Audit |
| Description | Blockchain analytics and crypto compliance for institutions | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise |
Both Elliptic and Hacken operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Hacken has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Elliptic's pricing and check Hacken's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.