Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Elliptic Elliptic provides blockchain analytics, compliance screening, and risk-management solutions covering Solana and 40+ blockchains. It is established compliance infrastructure for institutions. Its tool... Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems....
Both Elliptic and Hacken hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Elliptic uses a paid model, while Hacken is paid.
Elliptic offers 5 features including Blockchain analytics across Solana and 40+ chains, Compliance screening and transaction monitoring, AML/KYC tooling, and 2 more. Hacken counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Elliptic currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hacken is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Elliptic's key strengths include established institutional compliance platform, broad multi-chain coverage including solana, trusted by regulated entities. Hacken stands out for broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. On the flip side, Elliptic's weaknesses include enterprise compliance product, not for retail, while Hacken's main drawback is enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve).
More comparisons
Compare Elliptic with…
Compare Hacken with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 18,830 | 132,314 |
| Categories | Security & Audit, Analytics & Charts | Security & Audit |
| Description | Blockchain analytics and crypto compliance for institutions | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise |
Both Elliptic and Hacken operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Elliptic's pricing and check Hacken's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.