Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 17, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (6) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Robinhood Chain | Solana + Robinhood Chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
ether.fi ether.fi is a liquid staking and restaking protocol distinguished by a non-custodial design in which stakers retain control of their validator keys, addressing a criticism levelled at pooled staking p... GetBlock GetBlock is a Web3 infrastructure provider that gives developers instant access to blockchain RPC nodes rather than requiring them to run their own, supporting more than 130 protocols across mainnet a...
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.8/5 stars across 6 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for ether.fi (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
ether.fi uses a free model, while GetBlock is freemium. ether.fi has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though GetBlock's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
ether.fi offers 4 features including Non-custodial staking in which stakers keep control of validator keys, Liquid staking token that remains usable across DeFi while accruing rewards, Restaking layer for additional yield, and 1 more. GetBlock counters with 5 features including Managed JSON-RPC, REST, WebSocket and GraphQL access to Robinhood Chain, Coverage of both RHC mainnet (chain ID 4663) and testnet (chain ID 46630), Shared usage-based plans billed in Compute Units, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. ether.fi currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. GetBlock is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
ether.fi's key strengths include non-custodial key control is a genuine structural improvement over pooled alternatives, yield-bearing collateral that composes with lending markets, rapid growth and an established position among restaking protocols.
More comparisons
Compare ether.fi with…
Compare GetBlock with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 8 |
| Twitter Followers | 202,259 | 23,504 |
| Categories | Liquid Staking | RPC Providers |
| Description | Non-custodial liquid staking and restaking listed in the RHC ecosystem | Managed RPC node provider offering Robinhood Chain mainnet and testnet endpoints among 130+ supported chains |
While ether.fi (Liquid Staking) and GetBlock (RPC Providers) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. GetBlock has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — ether.fi is free to start and GetBlock is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.