Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Everstake Everstake is one of the largest staking providers in crypto, supporting 130+ networks with over 1.6 million delegators and billions in staked value. Founded in 2018, they've been validating on Solana... Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes...
Both Everstake and Figment hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Everstake uses a paid model, while Figment is paid.
Everstake offers 5 features including Solana validation since network's early days, ShredStream for optimized block propagation, Stake-Weighted QoS optimization, and 2 more. Figment counters with 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Everstake currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Figment is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Everstake's key strengths include one of the longest-running solana validators, enterprise-grade uptime and performance, massive delegator base shows trust. Figment stands out for top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. On the flip side, Everstake's weaknesses include commission rates may be higher than smaller validators, while Figment's main drawback is premium institutional pricing.
Both Everstake and Figment operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. We recommend trying both — check Everstake's pricing and check Figment's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.
More comparisons
Compare Everstake with…
Compare Figment with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 102,462 | 27,188 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Enterprise staking across 130+ networks with Solana-specific ShredStream optimization | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions |