Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Everstake Everstake is one of the largest staking providers in crypto, supporting 130+ networks with over 1.6 million delegators and billions in staked value. Founded in 2018, they've been validating on Solana... Kiln Kiln is the leading institutional staking platform operating 50,000+ validators and managing over $14 billion in staked assets across 50+ Proof-of-Stake networks. For Solana, Kiln represents approxima...
Both Everstake and Kiln hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Everstake uses a paid model, while Kiln is freemium.
Everstake offers 5 features including Solana validation since network's early days, ShredStream for optimized block propagation, Stake-Weighted QoS optimization, and 2 more. Kiln counters with 7 features including 50,000+ validators across 50+ PoS networks, $14B+ in managed staked assets, 2.5% of entire Solana network stake, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Everstake currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Kiln is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Everstake's key strengths include one of the longest-running solana validators, enterprise-grade uptime and performance, massive delegator base shows trust. Kiln stands out for enterprise-grade with soc 2 compliance, massive scale provides reliability, no minimum makes it accessible to everyone. On the flip side, Everstake's weaknesses include commission rates may be higher than smaller validators, while Kiln's main drawback is primarily targets institutional clients.
Both Everstake and Kiln operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. We recommend trying both — check Everstake's pricing and Kiln is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.
More comparisons
Compare Everstake with…
Compare Kiln with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 102,462 | 11,965 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Enterprise staking across 130+ networks with Solana-specific ShredStream optimization | Enterprise-grade staking platform managing $14B+ across 50+ PoS networks including Solana |