Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Everstake Everstake is one of the largest staking providers in crypto, supporting 130+ networks with over 1.6 million delegators and billions in staked value. Founded in 2018, they've been validating on Solana... Starke Finance Starke Finance is a Solana staking-analytics platform that helps users compare validators on performance, fees, and security to make informed delegation decisions. It is a research tool, not a staking...
Everstake is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Starke Finance (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Everstake uses a paid model, while Starke Finance is free. Starke Finance has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Everstake's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Everstake offers 5 features including Solana validation since network's early days, ShredStream for optimized block propagation, Stake-Weighted QoS optimization, and 2 more. Starke Finance counters with 5 features including Validator comparison across performance, fees, and security, Detailed validator rankings, APY comparisons, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Everstake currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Starke Finance is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Everstake's key strengths include one of the longest-running solana validators, enterprise-grade uptime and performance, massive delegator base shows trust. Starke Finance stands out for helps pick reliable, well-priced validators, combines metrics with educational guides, transparency before delegating. On the flip side, Everstake's weaknesses include commission rates may be higher than smaller validators, while Starke Finance's main drawback is analytics only — you stake elsewhere.
More comparisons
Compare Everstake with…
Compare Starke Finance with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 102,462 | 717 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking, Analytics & Charts |
| Description | Enterprise staking across 130+ networks with Solana-specific ShredStream optimization | Solana validator comparison and staking analytics platform |
Both Everstake and Starke Finance operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Everstake has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Everstake's pricing and Starke Finance is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.