FailSafe vs Hacken

Overview

FailSafe FailSafe is a blockchain security company offering smart contract audits, penetration testing, AI security assessments, and real-time threat monitoring for Solana programs. They have protected $10B+ i... Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems....

Community Ratings

Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for FailSafe (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

FailSafe uses a paid model, while Hacken is paid.

Key Features

FailSafe offers 5 features including Solana smart contract auditing, Penetration testing and AI security, Real-time threat monitoring, and 2 more. Hacken counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. FailSafe currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hacken is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

FailSafe's key strengths include specialized in solana program security, grant program lowers barrier for new projects, comprehensive audit methodology. Hacken stands out for broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. On the flip side, FailSafe's weaknesses include premium pricing for full audits, while Hacken's main drawback is enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve).