Head-to-head · DEXs & Swaps
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 11, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Fermi Fermi (Fermi Labs) is a Solana-based decentralized exchange built around a fully on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) rather than the constant-product AMM model most Solana DEXs use. Its flagship... HumidiFi HumidiFi is Solana's largest proprietary automated market maker (AMM), processing over $1 billion in daily trading volume and handling 35%+ of Solana's spot DEX activity. It sits at the core of Solana...
Both Fermi and HumidiFi hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Fermi uses a free model, while HumidiFi is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Fermi offers 4 features including Fully on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) with price-time priority, Decentralized limit order book that separates collateral custody from order placement, Continuum modular sequencing layer for fair transaction ordering and MEV mitigation, and 1 more. HumidiFi counters with 5 features including Proprietary AMM processing over $1B in daily volume, Handles 35%+ of Solana spot DEX activity, Private vault-based liquidity model, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Fermi currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. HumidiFi is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Fermi's key strengths include order-book model gives tighter spreads and more predictable fills than amms for active traders, non-custodial design keeps collateral under the trader's control, fair-ordering sequencer reduces front-running exposure. HumidiFi stands out for massive depth reduces slippage on large trades, over $1b daily volume signals strong liquidity, benefits traders indirectly via aggregator routing.
More comparisons
Compare Fermi with…
Compare HumidiFi with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,171 | — |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps | DEXs & Swaps |
| Description | Capital-efficient on-chain central limit order book DEX on Solana | Solana's largest proprietary AMM powering over $1B in daily volume |
Both Fermi and HumidiFi operate in the dexs & swaps space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Fermi is free to start and HumidiFi is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.