Head-to-head · DEXs & Swaps
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated November 8, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Fermi Fermi (Fermi Labs) is a Solana-based decentralized exchange built around a fully on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) rather than the constant-product AMM model most Solana DEXs use. Its flagship... Jupiter Studio Jupiter Studio is a no-code token launchpad on Solana from the team behind the Jupiter aggregator, distinct from the main swap product. Creators mint and launch a token in a guided flow using either M...
Both Fermi and Jupiter Studio hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Fermi uses a free model, while Jupiter Studio is paid. Fermi has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Jupiter Studio's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Fermi offers 4 features including Fully on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) with price-time priority, Decentralized limit order book that separates collateral custody from order placement, Continuum modular sequencing layer for fair transaction ordering and MEV mitigation, and 1 more. Jupiter Studio counters with 6 features including No-code token creation and launch on Solana, Meme Mode (preset) and Custom Mode (configurable tokenomics), Anti-sniper fee decaying from 99% to 0% over a randomized 15-60s window, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Fermi currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Jupiter Studio is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Fermi's key strengths include order-book model gives tighter spreads and more predictable fills than amms for active traders, non-custodial design keeps collateral under the trader's control, fair-ordering sequencer reduces front-running exposure.
More comparisons
Compare Fermi with…
Compare Jupiter Studio with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,205 | 28,560 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps | Token Launchers, DEXs & Swaps, DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Capital-efficient on-chain central limit order book DEX on Solana | No-code token launchpad from Jupiter, built on Solana |
Both Fermi and Jupiter Studio operate in the dexs & swaps space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Fermi is free to start and check Jupiter Studio's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.