Head-to-head · DEXs & Swaps
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 11, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Fermi Fermi (Fermi Labs) is a Solana-based decentralized exchange built around a fully on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) rather than the constant-product AMM model most Solana DEXs use. Its flagship... Matcha Matcha is a decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator built by 0x Labs that finds the best price for a token swap by routing across many liquidity sources — the 0x aggregation engine plus DEXs like Unis...
Both Fermi and Matcha hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Fermi uses a free model, while Matcha is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Fermi offers 4 features including Fully on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) with price-time priority, Decentralized limit order book that separates collateral custody from order placement, Continuum modular sequencing layer for fair transaction ordering and MEV mitigation, and 1 more. Matcha counters with 5 features including Aggregates many DEXs and liquidity sources (0x, Uniswap, SushiSwap, 1inch) for best price, Cross-chain: Solana plus EVM networks in one app, Token risk scores and liquidity insights to flag scams, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Fermi currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Matcha is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Fermi's key strengths include order-book model gives tighter spreads and more predictable fills than amms for active traders, non-custodial design keeps collateral under the trader's control, fair-ordering sequencer reduces front-running exposure. Matcha stands out for one of the few aggregators covering both solana and evm chains, optimal-route pricing aware of price impact and network fees, built-in scam/risk signals; self-custody.
More comparisons
Compare Fermi with…
Compare Matcha with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,171 | 83,890 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps | DEXs & Swaps |
| Description | Capital-efficient on-chain central limit order book DEX on Solana | Cross-chain DEX aggregator by 0x with Solana support |
Both Fermi and Matcha operate in the dexs & swaps space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Fermi is free to start and Matcha is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.