Head-to-head · DEXs & Swaps
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 11, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Unhealthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Fermi Fermi (Fermi Labs) is a Solana-based decentralized exchange built around a fully on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) rather than the constant-product AMM model most Solana DEXs use. Its flagship... Stabble Stabble is a next-generation decentralized exchange on Solana that combines two pool types in one protocol: weighted pools for volatile assets and composable stable pools optimized for stablecoin trad...
Both Fermi and Stabble hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Fermi uses a free model, while Stabble is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Fermi offers 4 features including Fully on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) with price-time priority, Decentralized limit order book that separates collateral custody from order placement, Continuum modular sequencing layer for fair transaction ordering and MEV mitigation, and 1 more. Stabble counters with 5 features including Weighted pools for volatile asset trading, Composable stable pools optimized for stablecoins, MEV recapture that returns arbitrage profit to LPs, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Fermi currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Stabble is rated unhealthy with 38.1% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Fermi's key strengths include order-book model gives tighter spreads and more predictable fills than amms for active traders, non-custodial design keeps collateral under the trader's control, fair-ordering sequencer reduces front-running exposure. Stabble stands out for returns recaptured mev and arbitrage profit to liquidity providers, high capital efficiency lowers the cost of providing depth, supports both volatile and stablecoin trading in one venue.
More comparisons
Compare Fermi with…
Compare Stabble with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,171 | 157,094 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps | DEXs & Swaps |
| Description | Capital-efficient on-chain central limit order book DEX on Solana | Capital-efficient Solana DEX with weighted and stable AMM pools |
Both Fermi and Stabble operate in the dexs & swaps space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Fermi is free to start and Stabble is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.