Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... InfStones InfStones is an enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure provider that manages over 20,000 nodes across 80+ protocols, including Solana. It gives institutional clients a single platform for running...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for InfStones (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Figment uses a paid model, while InfStones is paid.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. InfStones counters with 5 features including Managed node infrastructure across 80+ blockchain protocols including Solana, Dedicated RPC endpoints for institutional-grade access, Validator staking services with a reported zero-slashing track record, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. InfStones is rated healthy with 99.2% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. InfStones stands out for trusted by major platforms such as binance and bitgo, broad multi-chain coverage from a single provider, removes the operational burden of running and monitoring node fleets. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while InfStones's main drawback is built primarily for institutions rather than individual developers.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare InfStones with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | 60,570 |
| Categories | Staking | RPC Providers, Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Enterprise blockchain infrastructure — node management and staking across 80+ chains |
Both Figment and InfStones operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and check InfStones's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.