Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... Picasso Network Picasso Network enables SOL restaking to secure Actively Validated Services and provides trust-minimized IBC connections between Solana and Cosmos ecosystems. Supports SOL, mSOL, jitoSOL, and bSOL for...
Figment is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Picasso Network (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Figment uses a paid model, while Picasso Network is free. Picasso Network has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Figment's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. Picasso Network counters with 5 features including SOL and LST restaking for AVS security, IBC bridge connecting Solana to Cosmos, Fee-sharing model for stakers and restakers, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Picasso Network is rated healthy with 28.1% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. Picasso Network stands out for first protocol bringing ibc interoperability to solana, attractive fee-sharing rewards for restakers, expands solana cross-chain connectivity.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare Picasso Network with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | — |
| Categories | Staking | Staking, Bridges |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Solana restaking protocol enabling IBC cross-chain connections to Cosmos |
Both Figment and Picasso Network operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Figment has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and Picasso Network is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.