Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Figment Figment is one of the world's largest blockchain infrastructure companies, providing institutional-grade staking services across 40+ protocols including Solana. Their Solana staking offering includes... StakeView StakeView is a Solana validator performance ranking tool designed to help SOL holders make informed staking decisions. It surfaces historical APY, commission changes, and performance metrics across va...
Both Figment and StakeView hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Figment uses a paid model, while StakeView is free. StakeView has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Figment's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Figment offers 5 features including Institutional Solana staking with enterprise SLAs, Staking API for programmatic management, White-label staking solutions, and 2 more. StakeView counters with 5 features including Historical APY tracking across Solana validators, Commission change history to catch fee increases, Performance metrics for reliability comparison, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Figment currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. StakeView is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Figment's key strengths include top-tier institutional reputation, billions in staked assets, comprehensive apis for integration. StakeView stands out for makes opaque validator selection a data-driven choice, commission history protects delegators from surprise fee hikes, historical view helps identify consistently reliable validators. On the flip side, Figment's weaknesses include premium institutional pricing, while StakeView's main drawback is past validator performance does not guarantee future yields.
More comparisons
Compare Figment with…
Compare StakeView with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 27,188 | — |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Institutional-grade staking infrastructure for Solana with APIs and white-label solutions | Solana validator performance rankings with historical APY tracking |
Both Figment and StakeView operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Figment's pricing and StakeView is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.