Head-to-head · Developer Tools
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
FluxRPC FluxRPC is a performance-focused RPC provider for Solana — and the emerging Fogo chain — that architecturally separates the RPC serving layer from the validator. Decoupling the two lets it tune, cache... Reclaim Protocol Reclaim Protocol uses zkTLS infrastructure to let users prove facts about their Web2 data on-chain without exposing the underlying private information. It bridges the gap between the data people alrea...
FluxRPC is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Reclaim Protocol (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
FluxRPC uses a freemium model — Freemium 15 RPS. Free tier includes 10GB bandwidth, 15 RPS, WebSockets and Lantern local caching. Paid plans from $38/month, the cheapest includes 100 RPS and Yellowstone gRPC streaming. All plans include WebSockets. Bandwidth is only charged if your plan goes over., while Reclaim Protocol is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
FluxRPC offers 8 features including Solana and Fogo RPC endpoints, Yellowstone gRPC at $38/mo, gRPC, WebSockets, and full RPC in one plan, and 5 more. Reclaim Protocol counters with 5 features including zkTLS infrastructure for proving Web2 data on-chain, Zero-knowledge proofs that verify claims without exposing private data, Support for 250+ websites including bank, social, and ride data, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. FluxRPC currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Reclaim Protocol is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
FluxRPC's key strengths include no credits, no multipliers, no add-ons and nothing gated behind a higher tier, yellowstone grpc streaming from $38/mo, where most competitors charge much more for streaming, lantern local caching cuts bandwidth used by ~85%.
More comparisons
Compare FluxRPC with…
Compare Reclaim Protocol with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,618 | 8,446 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, RPC Providers | Security & Audit, Developer Tools |
| Description | gRPC, WebSockets, and full RPC in one plan from $38/mo. No credits, no multipliers, no add-ons and nothing gated behind a higher tier. | Zero-knowledge proof identity verification for Solana dApps |
Both FluxRPC and Reclaim Protocol operate in the developer tools space, so this is a direct head-to-head. FluxRPC has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — FluxRPC is free to start and Reclaim Protocol is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.