Head-to-head · RPC Providers
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated June 22, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Unknown | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 9 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
FluxRPC FluxRPC is a performance-focused RPC provider for Solana — and the emerging Fogo chain — that architecturally separates the RPC serving layer from the validator. Decoupling the two lets it tune, cache... RPC Fast RPC Fast provides dedicated Solana RPC endpoints optimized for low latency and high throughput. Built specifically for trading bots and applications that need fast transaction submission, it offers ba...
RPC Fast is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for FluxRPC (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
FluxRPC uses a paid model, while RPC Fast is paid — https://rpcfast.com/pricing.
FluxRPC offers 5 features including Solana and Fogo RPC endpoints, RPC serving decoupled from the validator layer, HTTP/3 + QUIC transport for low latency, and 2 more. RPC Fast counters with 9 features including Low-latency dedicated RPC nodes, High-performance bare-metal infrastructure, Yellowstone gRPC, and 6 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. FluxRPC currently has a unknown health status. RPC Fast is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
FluxRPC's key strengths include predictable bandwidth-based pricing vs. opaque credit systems, modern transport (http/3 / quic) for lower latency, hackathon-validated and already in production use. RPC Fast stands out for optimized for speed-sensitive applications, dedicated resources (not shared), good uptime track record. On the flip side, FluxRPC's weaknesses include newer provider competing with entrenched rpc incumbents, while RPC Fast's main drawback is no free tier.
More comparisons
Compare FluxRPC with…
Compare RPC Fast with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 446 |
| Categories | RPC Providers, Developer Tools | RPC Providers |
| Description | Solana RPC decoupled from the validator layer — HTTP/3 + QUIC with flat per-byte bandwidth pricing | Low-latency Solana RPC + data streaming for high-scale dApps, HFT, DeFi, and on-chain analytics. |
Both FluxRPC and RPC Fast operate in the rpc providers space, so this is a direct head-to-head. RPC Fast has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check FluxRPC's pricing and check RPC Fast's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.