Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Declining | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Footprint Analytics Footprint Analytics is a comprehensive blockchain data platform that processes data across 30+ chains including Solana, serving over 2 million NFT projects and 400 million wallet addresses. It aims to... GoldRush GoldRush is the developer-facing blockchain data API from Covalent, providing unified multichain access to wallet balances, transaction history, token pricing, and DEX activity. It lets builders query...
GoldRush is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Footprint Analytics (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Footprint Analytics uses a freemium model, while GoldRush is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
Footprint Analytics offers 5 features including No-code dashboard creation without SQL or pipelines, Coverage of 30+ chains including Solana, Enterprise APIs for programmatic data access, and 2 more. GoldRush counters with 5 features including Unified multichain REST and GraphQL data API, JavaScript/TypeScript SDK and CLI, Real-time WebSocket streaming for DEX events, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Footprint Analytics currently has a declining health status with 84.5% uptime over the last 30 days. GoldRush is rated healthy with 99.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Footprint Analytics's key strengths include no-code tools make on-chain analytics accessible to non-engineers, broad multi-chain coverage in one unified interface, enterprise apis serve teams needing programmatic access. GoldRush stands out for one consistent schema across 50+ chains, broad data coverage from balances to dex pairs, multiple access methods including streaming and pipelines.
More comparisons
Compare Footprint Analytics with…
Compare GoldRush with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 39,547 | 4,740 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing, Analytics & Charts | Data & Indexing |
| Description | No-code blockchain analytics across 30+ chains including Solana | Multichain blockchain data APIs with full Solana indexing from genesis |
Both Footprint Analytics and GoldRush operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. GoldRush has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Footprint Analytics is free to start and GoldRush is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.