Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Foxify Foxify is a P2P perpetual futures trading protocol on Solana where users can create custom trading pairs and take the other side of trades. Unlike traditional perp DEXs that use liquidity pools, Foxif... Sandglass Sandglass is a yield tokenization protocol on Solana that splits yield-bearing assets into two separate instruments: principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT). By separating the principal from the f...
Foxify is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Sandglass (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Foxify uses a free model, while Sandglass is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Foxify offers 6 features including P2P perpetual futures trading, Custom trading pair creation, Up to 200x leverage, and 3 more. Sandglass counters with 5 features including Splits yield-bearing assets into principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT), Fixed-rate yield locking via discounted principal tokens, Leveraged yield trading for amplified yield exposure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Foxify currently has a healthy health status with 98.1% uptime over the last 30 days. Sandglass is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Foxify's key strengths include unique p2p model for perps, custom pairs not available elsewhere, high leverage options. Sandglass stands out for brings pendle-style yield tokenization natively to solana, enables predictable fixed-rate returns through pt, supports both lst and lending yields as sources. On the flip side, Foxify's weaknesses include p2p model requires counterparty, while Sandglass's main drawback is yield tokenization is conceptually complex for newcomers.
More comparisons
Compare Foxify with…
Compare Sandglass with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 18,630 | 3,283 |
| Categories | DEXs & Swaps, DeFi & Yield | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Peer-to-peer perpetual futures DEX on Solana with customizable trading pairs | Yield tokenization protocol for Solana DeFi strategies |
Both Foxify and Sandglass operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Foxify has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Foxify is free to start and Sandglass is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.