Head-to-head · Comparison
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (4) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
GetBlock GetBlock is a multi-chain RPC node provider that gives developers API access to blockchain networks, including Solana, through both shared and dedicated nodes. The hook: one provider for Solana plus 1... Pinocchio Pinocchio is a zero-dependency Rust library for creating Solana programs, maintained by Anza — the team behind the core Agave client. Its design philosophy strips away external dependencies to give de...
GetBlock is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Pinocchio (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
GetBlock uses a freemium model, while Pinocchio is free. Pinocchio has the edge for budget-conscious users, though GetBlock's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
GetBlock offers 5 features including Solana RPC among 100+ chains, Shared multi-tenant nodes, Dedicated private nodes, and 2 more. Pinocchio counters with 5 features including Zero external dependencies for a lean program foundation, Up to 95 percent compute unit reduction versus standard approaches, Up to 40 percent smaller binary size, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. GetBlock currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Pinocchio is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
GetBlock's key strengths include broad multi-chain coverage, free tier to start, dedicated nodes for heavy workloads. Pinocchio stands out for dramatic compute and binary-size savings on solana, maintained by the core agave/anza team for credibility, zero dependencies reduce supply-chain surface. On the flip side, GetBlock's weaknesses include general provider, solana is one of 100+ chains, while Pinocchio's main drawback is low-level approach demands more developer effort than frameworks.
More comparisons
Compare GetBlock with…
Compare Pinocchio with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 5 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 23,949 | 21,568 |
| Categories | RPC Providers | SDKs & Libraries |
| Description | Multi-chain RPC provider with free and paid Solana nodes — shared and dedicated endpoints for dApps, bots, and analytics | Zero-dependency Rust library for building ultra-efficient Solana programs |
While GetBlock (RPC Providers) and Pinocchio (SDKs & Libraries) serve different primary purposes, users often consider both when building their Solana toolkit. GetBlock has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — GetBlock is free to start and Pinocchio is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.