Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 11, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 6 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
GoldRush GoldRush is the developer-facing blockchain data API from Covalent, providing unified multichain access to wallet balances, transaction history, token pricing, and DEX activity. It lets builders query... Shreder Shreder is a Solana data provider focused on the fastest possible transaction stream by tapping raw block data directly. Instead of waiting for full blocks, it streams shreds, the small UDP packets va...
GoldRush is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Shreder (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
GoldRush uses a freemium model, while Shreder is paid.
GoldRush offers 5 features including Unified multichain REST and GraphQL data API, JavaScript/TypeScript SDK and CLI, Real-time WebSocket streaming for DEX events, and 2 more. Shreder counters with 6 features including Decoded shred streaming with sub-100ms latency, Standard Yellowstone Geyser gRPC interface (drop-in), Multi-region: Amsterdam, Frankfurt, New York, Tokyo, London, and 3 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. GoldRush currently has a healthy health status with 99.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Shreder is rated healthy. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
GoldRush's key strengths include one consistent schema across 50+ chains, broad data coverage from balances to dex pairs, multiple access methods including streaming and pipelines. Shreder stands out for sub-100ms shred-based latency for same-block reactions, drop-in adoption via standard geyser grpc, multi-region deployment for redundancy. On the flip side, GoldRush's weaknesses include evm-first platform; solana is one of many chains, while Shreder's main drawback is shred data is unconfirmed and can be reordered or dropped.
More comparisons
Compare GoldRush with…
Compare Shreder with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 4,740 | — |
| Categories | Data & Indexing | Data & Indexing, RPC Providers |
| Description | Multichain blockchain data APIs with full Solana indexing from genesis | Sub-100ms Solana shred streaming and Geyser gRPC |
Both GoldRush and Shreder operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. GoldRush has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — GoldRush is free to start and check Shreder's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.