Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 17, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (2) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana + Robinhood Chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
GoldRush GoldRush is the developer-facing blockchain data API from Covalent, providing unified multichain access to wallet balances, transaction history, token pricing, and DEX activity. It lets builders query... Subsquid Subsquid (SQD) is a decentralized data lake and indexing framework supporting Solana that allows developers to extract, transform, and query on-chain data at scale. Unlike centralized indexing solutio...
Both GoldRush and Subsquid hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
GoldRush uses a freemium model, while Subsquid is freemium. Both offer free tiers with paid upgrades, so try each before committing to a paid plan.
GoldRush offers 5 features including Unified multichain REST and GraphQL data API, JavaScript/TypeScript SDK and CLI, Real-time WebSocket streaming for DEX events, and 2 more. Subsquid counters with 5 features including Decentralized data lake with native Solana support, Custom data indexing with SQL-like queries, Real-time and historical data access, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. GoldRush currently has a healthy health status with 99.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Subsquid is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
GoldRush's key strengths include one consistent schema across 50+ chains, broad data coverage from balances to dex pairs, multiple access methods including streaming and pipelines. Subsquid stands out for decentralized architecture avoids single points of failure, highly flexible data transformation for any solana use case, cost-effective compared to running custom indexing infrastructure. On the flip side, GoldRush's weaknesses include evm-first platform; solana is one of many chains, while Subsquid's main drawback is steeper learning curve than simpler api-based solutions like helius.
More comparisons
Compare GoldRush with…
Compare Subsquid with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 4,740 | 157,334 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing |
| Description | Multichain blockchain data APIs with full Solana indexing from genesis | Decentralized data indexing network for querying Solana blockchain data at scale |
Both GoldRush and Subsquid operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — GoldRush is free to start and Subsquid is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.