Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 17, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Declining |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
GoldRush GoldRush is the developer-facing blockchain data API from Covalent, providing unified multichain access to wallet balances, transaction history, token pricing, and DEX activity. It lets builders query... Supanode Supanode is a Solana infrastructure provider built around a low-latency Frankfurt edge, packaging RPC, real-time streaming, transaction landing, and historical data into one stack instead of forcing t...
GoldRush is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Supanode (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
GoldRush uses a freemium model, while Supanode is paid.
GoldRush offers 5 features including Unified multichain REST and GraphQL data API, JavaScript/TypeScript SDK and CLI, Real-time WebSocket streaming for DEX events, and 2 more. Supanode counters with 7 features including Yellowstone gRPC streaming (accounts, transactions, slots, blocks) at ~3.8ms p99 from Frankfurt with server-side filtering, ShredStream: raw block shreds over UDP at ~0.4ms p99 delivery, TPU Sender: stake-weighted transaction submission direct to slot leaders, bypassing the public mempool under congestion, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. GoldRush currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Supanode is rated declining. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
GoldRush's key strengths include one consistent schema across 50+ chains, broad data coverage from balances to dex pairs, multiple access methods including streaming and pipelines. Supanode stands out for frankfurt-based low-latency edge (sub-4ms grpc, sub-1ms shred delivery) suits latency-sensitive trading and mev workloads, stake-weighted tpu landing is independently benchmarked #1 of 18 submission services for getting transactions into blocks, integrated stack (rpc, streaming, transaction landing, indexing) avoids assembling multiple point vendors.
More comparisons
Compare GoldRush with…
Compare Supanode with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 4,784 | — |
| Categories | Data & Indexing | Data & Indexing, RPC Providers |
| Description | Multichain blockchain data APIs with full Solana indexing from genesis | Frankfurt-edge Solana RPC, gRPC streaming, ShredStream, and stake-weighted TPU transaction landing |
Both GoldRush and Supanode operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. GoldRush has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — GoldRush is free to start and check Supanode's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.