Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 17, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (3) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 1 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
GoldRush GoldRush is the developer-facing blockchain data API from Covalent, providing unified multichain access to wallet balances, transaction history, token pricing, and DEX activity. It lets builders query... Supra Supra (formerly SupraOracles) is a cross-chain oracle and automation network that supports Solana alongside EVM and Move-based chains. Its primary role is to deliver reliable external data — particula...
Both GoldRush and Supra hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
GoldRush uses a freemium model, while Supra is free. Supra has the edge for budget-conscious users, though GoldRush's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
GoldRush offers 5 features including Unified multichain REST and GraphQL data API, JavaScript/TypeScript SDK and CLI, Real-time WebSocket streaming for DEX events, and 2 more. Supra counters with 5 features including Native Solana price feeds with cross-chain support, On-chain verifiable random function (VRF), Automation for triggering on-chain actions, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. GoldRush currently has a healthy health status with 99.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Supra is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
GoldRush's key strengths include one consistent schema across 50+ chains, broad data coverage from balances to dex pairs, multiple access methods including streaming and pipelines. Supra stands out for combines oracle, vrf, and automation in one network, sub-second updates suit latency-sensitive defi, cross-chain reach helps multi-ecosystem deployments. On the flip side, GoldRush's weaknesses include evm-first platform; solana is one of many chains, while Supra's main drawback is protocols inherit a dependency on the oracle's accuracy and uptime.
More comparisons
Compare GoldRush with…
Compare Supra with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 4,740 | 306,363 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing |
| Description | Multichain blockchain data APIs with full Solana indexing from genesis | Cross-chain oracle network with native Solana price feeds |
Both GoldRush and Supra operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — GoldRush is free to start and Supra is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.